inland of it would make it practically useless to any one but the lessee of Marine Lot 3.
7. Approve the proposal to treat the two Lots as one and to issue one lease for 999 years in respect of both of them, the lease to date from 18/4/90 and the period within which the Dock is to be built to date from 18/4/00 and the rent to be subject to revision at intervals of 30 years.
R.E.S. 13/5.
500
Neither should you in the other.
they wished.
for as 75 year
I. I have ascertained that the firm cannot ask for renewal for another term; but we have dealt exceptionally with this case - with his approval.
J.J. 2/5
Sir M. Ommanner
I have seen the senior partner. They will look at the plan; we have got Marine Lot No. 3 on a lease for 999 years without any rent; and this inland lot No.1 is Mountain land, in its present condition perfectly useless to anyone but is being levelled by the firm at great expense; It seems to me to stand to reason that if you give it in one case you should give it in the other. If you did not propose periodic revision of Crown rent in the one case and what I suggest is, I think, the logical sequence of what has gone before.
C.P.L. 15. Mar
I agree that in the particulars mentioned, the terms for the two lots should be identical.
1715
inland of it would make it practically useless to any
one but the lessee of Marine Lot 3.
7 Approve the proposal to treat the two Lots as
one and
97
to issue one lease for 999 years in respect of both
of them, the lease to date fidd 18/4/90 and the period
within which the Dock is to be built to date from 18/4/00
and the rent to be subject to revision at intervals
of 30 years.
R.E.S. 13/5.
500
Neither should you
in the other.
they wished.
for as
75 year
I. I have ascertained that the firm cannot-if
fatiha ask for
M- Chambulain's rule for HongKory from land is bave, with fond of t
more on these teime.
opkin g
renewal for another tam; but we have
dealt exceptionally with this case - with his
afyunal,
д
afse
the angle
year...
mvisio
a
novelly
eving
Haughing.
? Wak
Iness's BTS to call
ね
(see 18852) when this portat night.
в
b. mentioned
JuJ 2/5
Sir M Ommanner
I have seen the senior partner.
will look at the plan, we have glet the
have marine lot no-3. "on a
firm
Youre
lease for
भ
you
€999
levision
a dock - without any
lent; and this inland lot nob! is Mountain & write, in its present condition perfectly welers to the goût a wh is being lovelled by the firm at great expense; It seems to me to stand to reason that if you base in one case you should give it in bad s then af if you did not propose fer- -odical reusion of Crown rent in the one case
give 999 year
the
and what I suggest is. I think. the
logical sequence of what has gone before
C.P.L
15. Mar
Jagree that in the particulars mentioned, the terms for the two hot shemulde
identicali
1715
aloun
L
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.